This post may contain affiliate links. If you decide to make a purchase through these links, I earn a small commission at no cost to you. I do not promote anything I do not believe in or stand behind.
What is Zionism?
The word appears constantly in news reports, political debates, university protests, churches, and social media.
Yet people often use it without defining it.
For some, Zionism means Jewish self-determination in the ancestral homeland of the Jewish people.
For others, the word carries political, religious, or even deeply negative associations.
Christians can easily add another layer of confusion by treating modern political Zionism as though it were simply identical to every biblical promise concerning Zion.
Therefore, before defending or criticizing Zionism, we should understand what the term actually means.
Historically, Zionism is the modern Jewish national movement that sought the establishment—and later the preservation—of a Jewish homeland or state in the historic Land of Israel.
However, Zionism has never been a single theological ideology.
Some Zionists have been deeply religious.
Others have been secular.
Some were socialists.
Others were nationalists, liberals, revisionists, or religious Zionists.
So what is Zionism, how did it develop, and how should Christians think about it?
Let us begin with Zion itself.
1. What Is Zionism? First Understand Zion
The word Zion comes from the Bible.
At different places in Scripture, Zion can refer specifically to Jerusalem, to the city of David, to God’s dwelling place, and more broadly to God’s people and their hope.
Psalm 137 records the anguish of Jewish exiles in Babylon:
“If I forget you, O Jerusalem, let my right hand forget its skill!”
This longing for Jerusalem existed many centuries before modern Zionism.
Jewish liturgy also preserved Jerusalem at the center of religious memory. The Amidah traditionally includes prayer concerning Jerusalem, and the Passover Seder famously concludes with the hope, “Next year in Jerusalem.”
Therefore, modern Zionism did not invent the Jewish attachment to the Land of Israel.
Yet we should make an important distinction:
Biblical Zion and modern political Zionism are related concepts, but they are not identical concepts.
Modern Zionism emerged in a particular nineteenth-century political and historical context.
2. The Jewish Connection to Israel Predates Modern Zionism
For centuries after the destruction of Jerusalem and dispersion of Jewish communities, Jewish people lived throughout Europe, North Africa, the Middle East, and elsewhere.
Nevertheless, Jerusalem and the Land of Israel remained deeply embedded within Jewish prayer, Scripture, festivals, and communal memory.
That does not mean every Jew throughout history wanted immediately to emigrate there.
Jewish communities developed rich lives throughout the Diaspora.
Still, the ancestral and religious connection to the land remained powerful.
This is important because modern Zionism did not begin with Theodor Herzl suddenly choosing an arbitrary piece of territory.
Zionist leaders focused primarily on the historic Land of Israel because of the ancient Jewish connection to that land.
For Christians, this history also intersects with biblical history.
Abraham.
Isaac.
Jacob.
David.
The prophets.
Jesus.
The apostles.
The story of Scripture is geographically rooted in this land.
However, recognizing that connection is different from saying every modern political decision made within that land is automatically commanded by God.
We must keep those categories separate.
3. What Is Modern Zionism?
Modern political Zionism arose primarily in Europe during the nineteenth century.
Long before Herzl became its best-known leader, Jewish thinkers and activists were already discussing national revival, migration, Hebrew culture, and a return to the Land of Israel.
Nathan Birnbaum, for example, helped develop early Jewish nationalist organizations and coined the terms that became known as Zionism.
Later, Theodor Herzl transformed Zionism into a much more organized international political movement.
The crucial distinction is this:
Modern Zionism was not originally a single religious movement claiming, “God gave us the land.”
Many major Zionist leaders were secular.
Rather, modern Zionism argued that the Jewish people constituted a people or nation and needed a secure national home.
For some, that conviction was theological.
For others, it was cultural, political, or driven by the experience of antisemitism.
That diversity remains important when asking what is Zionism.
4. Pogroms Helped Create the Context for Zionism
Modern Zionism developed against the background of severe antisemitism in Europe.
In the Russian Empire, widespread anti-Jewish pogroms erupted particularly in the years following the assassination of Tsar Alexander II in 1881.
The word pogrom came to describe violent attacks against Jewish communities involving destruction, looting, assault, and sometimes murder. Historical evidence also shows varying levels of governmental or police encouragement in different incidents.
These persecutions caused many Jews to reconsider their future in Europe.
Large numbers emigrated to the United States and elsewhere.
Others moved toward Israel and joined developing Jewish communities there.
Therefore, Zionism grew partly from an increasingly urgent question:
Could Jewish people remain permanently safe as vulnerable minorities within societies that repeatedly turned against them?
For many Zionists, the answer eventually became:
The Jewish people need political self-determination and a homeland of their own.
5. Theodor Herzl and the Dreyfus Affair
Theodor Herzl became the most famous architect of political Zionism.
The original version of this article says that the Dreyfus Affair convinced Herzl of Zionism.
I would make that statement more careful.
Herzl was deeply affected by European antisemitism, and the Dreyfus Affair became an important part of that context.
Alfred Dreyfus was a Jewish French army officer wrongly convicted of treason in 1894.
His trial was deeply compromised: secret material was shown to the judges but withheld from the defense, some evidence was forged, and subsequent evidence implicated Ferdinand Walsin Esterhazy instead.
Herzl covered the affair while working as a journalist in Paris. Historical accounts commonly regard the affair as reinforcing his conviction that Jewish emancipation had not solved European antisemitism, although it should not be treated as the only event that created his Zionist thinking.
6. What Did Herzl Actually Want?
In 1896, Herzl published Der Judenstaat—The Jewish State.
His argument was that the Jewish question required a political solution involving national self-government.
Then, in 1897, he convened the First Zionist Congress in Basel, Switzerland.
Approximately 200 delegates participated.
The Congress established the organized Zionist movement and adopted what became known as the Basel Program.
Its goal was to establish for the Jewish people a publicly and legally secured home in Israel, then under Ottoman rule.
Herzl famously wrote privately after the Congress that he had, in a sense, “founded the Jewish State.”
He did not mean that a sovereign state literally existed in 1897.
Rather, Basel had created the political organization and vision that he believed could eventually produce one.
That distinction improves the historical statement considerably.
Zionism Was Debated Among Jews
It is also important to remember that Jews themselves disagreed strongly about Zionism.
Some Orthodox Jewish leaders opposed political Zionism because they believed Jewish national restoration should await divine redemption.
Other religious Jewish thinkers eventually embraced Zionism.
Secular Jews also disagreed.
Some favored assimilation within European societies.
Others supported various forms of Jewish cultural autonomy in the Diaspora.
Zionists themselves differed over:
religion,
socialism,
economics,
territory,
language,
and the character of the future state.
Therefore, statements such as:
“Jews believe…”
or
“Zionists believe…”
should usually make us cautious.
Jewish thought has never been monolithic.
Neither has Zionism.
7. Zionism Eventually Led to the State of Israel
After decades of Jewish immigration, political organization, British rule under the Mandate, increasing conflict between Jewish and Arab communities, the Holocaust, and international diplomacy, the question of Palestine came before the United Nations.
On November 29, 1947, UN General Assembly Resolution 181 recommended partition into an Arab state and a Jewish state, with Jerusalem under a special international regime.
The Jewish leadership accepted the partition framework.
Palestinian Arab leadership and surrounding Arab states rejected it.
War followed.
On May 14, 1948, the State of Israel declared independence. The proposed Arab state in the partition plan did not come into existence, and the war also produced large-scale Palestinian displacement and a refugee crisis whose consequences remain part of the conflict today.
Therefore, we should not simply say:
“The UN created Israel.”
Neither should we erase the Arab population or the conflict surrounding Israel’s birth.
History is more complicated.
What Is Zionism Today?
After 1948, Zionism changed.
Its original goal—the establishment of a Jewish state—had been achieved.
Today, Zionism generally involves supporting the continued existence, security, development, and Jewish national character of the State of Israel.
The World Zionist Organization describes contemporary Zionism in terms that include Jewish unity, the bond with Eretz Israel, aliyah, Jewish education, security, and the continued development of Israel as a Jewish and democratic state.
However, Zionists disagree considerably about Israeli politics.
A person can be Zionist and criticize an Israeli prime minister.
Zionists may disagree about settlements.
Borders.
A Palestinian statehood.
Military policy.
Religion and state.
Judicial reform.
The peace process.
Therefore:
Zionism is not identical to support for every decision of the Israeli government.
That distinction is essential.
Is Zionism the Same as Judaism?
No.
Judaism is an ancient religious and civilizational tradition.
Modern Zionism is a comparatively recent Jewish national movement.
Many Zionists are Jewish.
Some Zionists are Christians.
Some Jewish people are non-Zionists or anti-Zionists.
Others define their relationship with Zionism in ways that do not fit neatly into simple categories.
Therefore, Christianity should not speak as though:
Jewish = Zionist
or:
Zionist = religious Jew.
Neither statement is historically accurate.
Is Zionism the Same as Antisemitism?
No.
Zionism and antisemitism describe different things.
Zionism concerns Jewish national self-determination and Israel.
Antisemitism concerns prejudice, hostility, or discrimination against Jews as Jews.
Likewise, anti-Zionism and antisemitism are not automatically identical.
Someone may oppose Zionism for political or ideological reasons without hating Jewish people.
At the same time, anti-Zionist rhetoric can sometimes employ classic antisemitic stereotypes or deny Jews rights it grants to other peoples.
Therefore, each argument should be evaluated according to what it actually says.
We will explore this distinction more fully here:
What Is Zionism From a Christian Perspective?
Now we move from history to theology.
This distinction is extremely important.
History can tell us:
when Herzl lived,
what the Basel Program said,
what happened during the Dreyfus Affair,
and when Israel declared independence.
Theology asks a different question:
How should Christians understand these events in light of Scripture?
My own perspective is Christian and Zionist.
I believe the Bible establishes a unique historical and covenantal relationship between God, the Jewish people, and the Land of Israel.
Genesis 12 begins God’s covenant story with Abraham.
Later biblical covenants repeatedly connect Abraham’s descendants with the land.
The prophets also speak about Israel’s judgment, exile, preservation, and restoration.
Romans 9–11 makes clear that Israel continues to have profound significance within God’s redemptive purposes.
However, we should not move from those biblical truths to careless political conclusions.
Biblical Israel and the Modern State of Israel
The modern State of Israel and biblical Israel are connected historically and ethnically, but they should not simply be collapsed into one another.
The modern State of Israel is a contemporary nation-state.
It has:
a parliament,
political parties,
courts,
a military,
elections,
secular citizens,
religious citizens,
Jewish citizens,
Arab citizens,
and ordinary political disagreements.
Therefore, saying that God has purposes for Israel does not mean:
every Israeli government policy is God’s policy.
Biblical prophets themselves loved Israel while fiercely condemning injustice within Israel.
Consequently, Christian support for Israel should never require moral blindness.
Truth remains truth regardless of who violates it.
Does Supporting Zionism Mean Ignoring Palestinians?
It should not.
Christians can affirm the historic connection of the Jewish people to the Land of Israel and the legitimacy of Jewish self-determination while also affirming the dignity of Palestinians.
Palestinians are not theological obstacles.
They are human beings made in the image of God.
Jewish civilians are made in God’s image.
Palestinian civilians are made in God’s image.
Therefore, Christian theology should resist dehumanization from every direction.
One does not have to erase Jewish history to care about Palestinian suffering.
Likewise, one does not have to deny Palestinian suffering in order to reject antisemitism or affirm Israel’s existence.
Biblical conviction and compassion should remain together.
Does Opposing Zionism Mean Opposing God?
My theological conviction is that Jewish restoration to the land fits within God’s purposes.
From my reading of Scripture, I believe the enduring relationship between the Jewish people and the Land of Israel should be taken seriously.
And I believe Christians should reject efforts to deny the Jewish people the same basic dignity and security we recognize for other peoples.
Christian Zionism Must Remain Christian
Christian Zionism can itself go wrong.
If our support for Israel causes us to:
excuse injustice,
despise Arabs,
mock Palestinian suffering,
spread false information,
or treat political power as more important than the gospel,
something has gone wrong.
Likewise, Christians who criticize Israel should guard against:
antisemitic stereotypes,
collective blame,
Holocaust minimization,
or denying Jewish peoplehood and history.
Jesus does not give us permission to abandon truth or love depending on which side of a conflict we prefer.
Therefore, Christian Zionism should remain shaped by:
Scripture,
truth,
justice,
mercy,
love of neighbor,
and the gospel of Jesus Christ.
What Is Zionism? 7 Things to Remember
If you remember nothing else, remember these seven points.
1. Zion existed in Jewish Scripture and memory long before modern Zionism.
2. Modern Zionism arose primarily as a Jewish national movement in nineteenth-century Europe.
3. Zionism has included both religious and secular Jews.
4. European antisemitism and pogroms helped create the urgency behind political Zionism.
5. Theodor Herzl organized Zionism internationally but did not invent Jewish attachment to the land.
6. The Zionist movement eventually contributed to the establishment of Israel in 1948.
7. Supporting Zionism does not require supporting every policy of the modern Israeli government.
These distinctions help Christians speak more accurately.
What Is Zionism? A Christian Conclusion
So, what is Zionism?
Historically, it is the Jewish national movement for a homeland and self-determination in the historic Land of Israel.
Theologically, Christians disagree about how modern Israel relates to biblical prophecy and covenant.
My conviction is that Scripture gives Christians strong reasons to take seriously the enduring relationship between the Jewish people, Israel, and the biblical land.
Yet conviction should not become carelessness.
We should know history before making historical claims.
Read Scripture before making prophetic claims.
Reject antisemitism.
Reject dehumanization.
Care about justice.
Pray for Jewish people.
Pray for Palestinians.
Pray for peace in Jerusalem.
And above all, remember that our ultimate hope is not placed in any earthly government.
Our hope is in Jesus the Messiah, the King of Israel and the Savior of the world.
Understanding what Zionism is allows Christians to support what is true without turning political slogans into theology—and to hold biblical conviction together with truth, justice, and love of neighbor.
Continue the Study
Biblical promises concerning the land:
Anti-Zionism and antisemitism:
The Messiah and Israel:
I am a blogger, writer, pastor, Director of Zion Romania Bible School, husband to Olguta, a father and, most importantly, a child of God. I also completed my studies at the King’s University where I earned a B.A. in Theology with a concentration in Messianic Jewish Studies. I love Israel and I love the ‘Jewishness’ of the Bible.
[…] this post, I want to highlight the deep historical roots of anti-Zionism, as it is a mutation of antisemitism. Therefore, I argue that one must understand the origins of […]